Legal Opinion

Mattingly's Administrator v. Hines

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 24, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

*177Opinion or the Court by

Turner, Commissioner

Affirming. '

Robert A. Mattingly in .July, 1918, was a carpenter in the city of'Louisville and employed by the Alfred Struck Co., contractors.

At that time the Alfred Struck Co., under contract with the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., was doing certain reconstruction work at its extensive railroad shops in Louisville, the same having been necessitated by a fire.

At one place in the yards, and at a point where part of this reconstruction work was going on, the railroad company operated an overhead, traveling crane for some distance, running north…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. L. & N. R. R. v. Smith's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. NewlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Wells v. Duncan Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Bradas v. Henry Vogt Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Poole v. Lutz & Schmidt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Commonwealth v. Hatfield Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API