Legal Opinion

Bradas v. Henry Vogt Machine Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 25, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, First Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Reversing.

The appellant, William T. Bradas, was by occupation a painter and had been engaged for nine or ten years, in greater part, as a painter of carriages and automobiles, but was, also, a painter of houses. He *804was employed by the appellant, Henry Yogt Machine Company, to assist in painting the building in which its manufacturing concern was located. "While working there, he was under the direction of a foreman, who directed him what to do and the manner of its being done. The building was about three hundred feet long and through the center- of it, from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cahill v. CincinnatiCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Earl's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ross v. Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. KennardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Mattingly's Administrator v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API