Legal Opinion

Romeo v. White

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided July 29, 2009No. 200700717Published

1Opinion of the Court

Quinlan, Regina L., J.

The plaintiffs have brought this action against the defendant alleging in Count I trespass and in Count III a violation of G.L.c. 242, §7. The plaintiffs have moved for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is ALLOWED.

FACTS

Based upon the pleadings, the following facts are undisputed.

The plaintiffs are the owners of property located at 465 Shootflying Hill Road, Centerville, MA. The defendant is the owner of 471 Shootflying Hill Road, Cen-terville, MA. The two properties share a common lot line and are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Highlands Insurance v. Aerovox Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Trinity Church in the City v. John Hancock Mut. L. Ins.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Massachusetts Port Authority v. Sciaba Construction Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Medford Housing Authority v. MARINUCCI BROS. & CO. INCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  5. Moskow v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API