Legal Opinion
Medford Housing Authority v. MARINUCCI BROS. & CO. INC
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 15, 1968PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
The plaintiffs in separate actions of tort had verdicts against the defendant for damage to the paint on structures separately owned by them caused by hydrogen sulphide gas released into the air in the course of dredging operations in the Mystic River carried on by the defendant in 1961 under contract with the Commonwealth.
The cases were tried together. The plaintiffs rested their cases on the reports of an auditor.
1. Findings that the defendant was negligent were warranted on the evidence and it was not error to deny motions for directed verdicts. The contract required the removal of large…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Colangeli v. Construction Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Childs v. O'LearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor: Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Paul Sprague v. Boston and Maine Corporation, Paul Sprague v. Boston and Maine CorpCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Malden Mills Industries, Inc. v. Maroun (In Re Malden Mills Industries, Inc.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2004
- Brossi v. FisherMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Massachusetts Port Authority v. Sciaba Construction Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.