Legal Opinion
Trinity Church in the City v. John Hancock Mut. L. Ins.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 15, 1987PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
This case arises out of property damage sustained by the plaintiff, Trinity Church in the City of Boston, during construction of the John Hancock Tower Building in Copley Square. On January 29, 1975, the plaintiff filed a complaint against John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and *45seventeen other defendants involved in the construction of the Hancock tower. At the defendants’ request the claims against the eight defendants to the present action for excavation-related damages were tried separately from the fallen object claims.2 This appeal concerns only the counts related to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. The Ss Zoe Colocotroni, Her Engines, Appurtenances, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Newton Girl Scout Council, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Griffin v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Carey v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
- Conway v. Electro Switch Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Commonwealth v. Johnson InsulationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- State of Ohio v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., Asarco Inc., Intervenors. National Wildlife Federation v. Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., Chemical Manufacturers Association, American Petroleum Institute, Asarco Inc., Intervenors. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, American Petroleum Institute, American Mining Congress, Asarco, Inc., Public Service Electric and Gas Co., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. State of Colorado v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Asarco Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. State of New York v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco, Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. People of the State of California, Ex Rel. John K. Van De Kamp, Attorney General of California v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, American Mining Congress, Public Service Electric and Gas Co., American Petroleum Institute, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. Chemical Manufacturers Association v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., National Wildlife Federation, Intervenors. Public Service Electric & Gas Company, and Dana Corporation v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior and United States of America, Edison Electric Institute, Asarco Inc., National Wildlife Federation, Intervenors. National Wildlife Federation v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the Interior, State of New York v. United States Department of the Interior, Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary of Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.