People v. Tatlis
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
Introduction
Defendant James William Tatlis appeals from the judgment entered after he was resentenced to state prison for the term prescribed by law. In addition, defendant petitions for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground he was denied due process of law at his resentencing hearing.
Procedural Background
Defendant pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12021), after which a jury found him guilty of two counts of forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), two counts of forcible oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (c)) and one…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. CovinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. GuevaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. BullockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. BohannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. LlamasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- In re R.R. CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.