Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Crews

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1915No. 3929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by L. G. Crews against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

The plaintiff in error will be designated as “defendant,” and defendant in error as “plaintiff,” in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.

This is an action for debt commenced on July 27, 1910, by plaintiff, a resident citizen of Oklahoma, against defendant, a Missouri railway corporation owning and operating a line of its road in Pontotoc county, Okla. The defendant, on September 22, 1910, answered by a general denial; but on September 29, 1911, the day of the trial, it filed an amended answer admitting said indebtedness to the amount of $406.20, less a…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Drummond v. DrummondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Winemiller v. LortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. City Nat. Bank of Lawton, Okl. v. Lummus Cotton Gin Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Hudson v. HudsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. City of Denver v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API