Legal Opinion

Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Roe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1915No. 4658PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Major County; James W. Steen, Judge. Action by A. A. Roe, as administrator of the estate of C. W. Rue, deceased, against the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This action was brought by A. A. Roe, as administrator of the estate of C. W. Rue, deceased, against the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company, for $25,000, for the death of C. W. Rue, in which it is claimed that Rue came to his death on the 18th day of December, 1909, on account of the negligence of the defendant company while he was acting as a conductor of a- train engaged in interstate commerce, said train consisting of a switch engine and several cars of coal, the same being taken from Clinton, Okla., to Altus, Okla.,. and claimed by the plaintiff to be a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. HolbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Morgan v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hines v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Petroleum Iron Works Co. v. BullingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Pittsburg County Ry. Co. v. HastySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Schaff v. DaughertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API