Legal Opinion
United States v. Zomber
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 12, 2008No. 06-1287, 06-2230, 07-1933UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JORDAN, Circuit Judge.
In this combined direct appeal and collateral proceeding, Michael Zomber challenges his conviction for conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. On direct appeal, he maintains that his conviction and sentence should be vacated for six reasons: (1) the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction; (2) he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel; (3) the government improperly withheld evidence that should have been produced under the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Goldberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- LaSalle National Bank v. First Connecticut Holding Group, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Robert Fitzgerald Hill, Robert F. HillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- United States v. Kenneth OlsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013