Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Kenneth Olsen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2013No. 17-56432Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge KOZINSKI, with whom Judges PREGERSON, REINHARDT, THOMAS and WATFORD

join, dissenting from the order denying the petition for rehearing en banc:

There is an epidemic of Brady violations abroad in the land. Only judges can put a stop to it.

I

Kenneth Olsen was convicted by a federal jury of knowingly developing a biological agent for use as a weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 175. United States v. Olsen, 704 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2013). Olsen admitted that he produced ricin, a highly toxic poison, but argued that he didn’t intend to use it as a weapon. Instead, he claimed that he…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Van de Kamp v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API