Legal Opinion

Crossfield v. Allen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 18, 1986No. 84-1319PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bettie C. Allen and Roberta C. Weideman filed a complaint relating to a parcel of real estate located in Gadsden, Alabama. The land is owned by Bettie and Roberta and their mother, Verdie A. Crossfield, by virtue of a deed executed on July 14, 1982. The actual relief sought was that the property be sold at a private sale for $30,000 and the mother's share of the proceeds used to pay for her care and maintenance.

Prior to the filing of this lawsuit, Verdie was determined to be non compos mentis and Wayne Copeland was appointed as her guardian. At the hearing of this case on June 6, 1985,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  2. Thrasher v. BartlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Ex parte WindhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Pruett v. Ralston Purina CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Walker County Department of Pensions & Security v. MasonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duncan v. First Nat. Bank of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Dallas County Bd. of Educ. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Lynum v. LynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Bell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Crossfield v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API