Legal Opinion

Pruett v. Ralston Purina Company

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 12, 1962No. 4 Div. 136PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellants’’ petition for intervention and granting appellee’s motion to strike the petition. There seems to be no question that a judgment or decree denying the right of intervention is appealable. Rollins v. Deason, 263 Ala. 358, 82 So.2d 546, and cases there cited.

Appellee sued appellants A. W. Pitts, Sr. and Annie Pitts on an account in August, 1960. Pleas of the general issue and recoupment were filed, various other pleadings were had, and the cause was set for trial on April 9, 1962. On Friday, April 6, appellants A. W. Pitts, Jr.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Greene v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Rollins v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. McIntyre v. DowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  2. Duncan v. First Nat. Bank of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Finkenbinder v. BurtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. General Tel. Co. of Southeast v. ALABAMA, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Beitel v. BOARD OF SCHOOL COM'RS OF MOBILE CTY.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API