Legal Opinion

Eno v. Jewell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 12, 2015No. 13-15166Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 27, 2015, appearing at 798 F.3d 1245, is hereby amended. The petition for rehearing is granted in part and the opinion is amended as follows:

*1155At slip op. page 11 n. 2 [798 F.3d at 1251], change “We observed as much in a prior appeal involving Eno and charges of unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands.” to “We observed as much in a prior appeal, involving unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands, to which Eno was not a party.”

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donald Eno v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API