Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Bartee

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 18, 1923No. 5 Div. 841PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, j.

The amended bill, filed by Bartee,' appellee, sought specific performance of a contract with appellant Matthews to sell Bartee about 327 acres of land at the purchase price of $10 the acre. Subsequent to .this agreement, and, according to Bartee’s contention, while it was of force, Matthews! and others having an interest in the land conveyed it, for an advanced price, to the appellant M. J. Reeder, who, it is insisted by Bar-tee, was at the time and theretofore advised of the existence of appellee’s contract with Matthews to purchase the land. The court awarded the relief sought,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. BurdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  2. Alba v. StrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Bentley v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Forney v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Martin v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Boozer v. BlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Bartee v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Sadler v. RadcliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Dobson v. DeasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API