Boozer v. Blake
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The demurrer on this appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of a bill in equity, and the petition for mandamus presents the ruling of the court on a motion to strike parts of it for impertinence.
We will first consider the demurrer to the bill as last amended, which was sustained by the court and the bill dismissed.
Briefly the bill is for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of all the capital stock in an Alabama corporation, known as Muscle Shoals White Lime Company, owned by the respondents Mrs. Emma B. Yourtree, J. H. Werner and W. C. Roberts, who are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McFadden & Bro. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Ashurst v. PeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- First National Bank of Gadsden v. Winchester.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Asbury v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- General Securities Corporation v. WeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fishkin v. Hi-Acres, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Lightsey v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Ingram v. Omelet Shoppe, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Madison Limestone Company v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.