Legal Opinion

Boozer v. Blake

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 24, 1944No. 8 Div. 258PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The demurrer on this appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of a bill in equity, and the petition for mandamus presents the ruling of the court on a motion to strike parts of it for impertinence.

We will first consider the demurrer to the bill as last amended, which was sustained by the court and the bill dismissed.

Briefly the bill is for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of all the capital stock in an Alabama corporation, known as Muscle Shoals White Lime Company, owned by the respondents Mrs. Emma B. Yourtree, J. H. Werner and W. C. Roberts, who are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McFadden & Bro. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Ashurst v. PeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. First National Bank of Gadsden v. Winchester.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Asbury v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. General Securities Corporation v. WeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fishkin v. Hi-Acres, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Lightsey v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Ingram v. Omelet Shoppe, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Madison Limestone Company v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API