Legal Opinion
Crummey v. Murray
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction is met with an application by defendants to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. That pleading discloses that the defendants are trustees of the residuary estate of George W. Murray, deceased, under his last will, testament and codicil; that at the túne of his ■death the testator’s estate was invested in realty and in bonds and stocks of various corporations, including stock of the National Bank of Orange County and the Goshen National Bank; that in paragraph “eighth” of the will the following provision is made: “ * * * it is my Will and I so…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The People Ex Rel. the Mayor v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Munson v. Syracuse, Geneva & Corning R. R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Pyle v. PyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Pyle v. . PyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- In re the Estate of HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Perdue v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Fine v. SaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- In re the Estate of AngellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Swarts v. Board of Education of the City School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.