Legal Opinion
United States v. John Henry Young
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1991No. 90-30257PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Per curiam
Following his conviction and sentencing for assaulting a federal officer and related charges, John Henry Young filed, pro se, a motion to correct an illegal sentence. The district court denied the motion, as well as Young’s subsequent motion to reconsider. We affirm.
I
On March 23, 1988, Young and his cousin, James Snell, were shooting gophers on the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation in Montana. Two Bureau of Indian Affairs police officers stopped Snell’s automobile for running a stop sign. One of the officers, Sergeant Myron Oats, recognized Young as the subject of two outstanding tribal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Leonard Joseph YannottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Martin Allen JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Darrell Chip Wadena, United States of America v. Jerry Joseph Rawley, Jr., United States of America v. Rick ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Frido SeesingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donovan Dwayne Oliver Darryl Lee McMillan Nathaniel JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.