Legal Opinion

Frear v. Pugsley

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action to impress certain funds' with a trust in favor of plaintiff and defendant Tompkins.

1Opinion of the CourtTruax, J.

Alexander Frear died in 1882, leaving his widow, the plaintiff, surviving him. By his will he appointed the plaintiff and the defendants Bartley and Tompkins trustees of certain trusts created in the will. The plaintiff never acted as such trustee. The testator gave to the trustees named in the will $20,000 to be placed on bond and mortgage, and he directed the trustees to apply the income and interest thereof to the use and benefit of his sister, Helen M. Dean, during her life, and gave to his said sister “ power and authority to dispose of said principal sum of $20,000 by last will and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Cutting v. . CuttingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Crooke v. . County of KingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Maitland v. BaldwinNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WildenburgNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  2. Cheever v. CheeverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Lehman v. SpicerNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Shotland v. MulliganAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API