Legal Opinion

Maitland v. Baldwin

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Motion for judgment on verdict subject to opinion of the court. Action by Thomas A. Maitland, executor of Sarah Parish Dillon, deceased, against Townsend B. Baldwin, executor of Robert James Dillon, deceased. Plaintiff moves for judgment on a verdict directed in his favor, subject to opinion of general term.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought to recover a legacy. The facts of the case are as follows: One Robert J. Dillon

died in November, 1872, leaving a last will and testament which contained the following provision:

“At the death of my wife, I give §50,000, in such manner and form, and to such person or persons, as she, by her last will and testament, may direct, limit, and appoint.”

He named as one of his executors Townsend B. Baldwin, who is now the sole surviving executor and trustee of said will. His wife, Sarah Parish Dillon, died on the 31st of October, 1891, leaving a last will and testament in which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haynes v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Dana v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bray v. O'RourkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Cameron v. CrowleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
  4. In re the Estate of JacksonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  5. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API