Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Wildenburg

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 26, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

In this accounting proceeding the questions presented for determination are:(1) Whether the testatrix validly exercised a power of appointment conferred upon her under the will of her father?(2) If validly exercised, the ascertainment of the persons to whom the fund is to be paid?(3) Whether the exercise of the power failed and payment should be directed to be made to the legal representative of the estate of the donor for the benefit of the estates of the deceased residuary legatees under the terms of his will?

The surrogate holds that the appointment was validly exercised and that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Roseboom v. . RoseboomNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Tillman v. . OgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Cutting v. . CuttingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Cammann v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Riker v. . CornwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WalbridgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
  2. Lamkin v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Massey v. Guaranty Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. In re the Estate of OwenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API