State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Reginald McKinley Williams (“defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We conclude that the trial court had adequate grounds for its denial of defendant’s motion to suppress and affirm the trial court’s ruling.
I. Background
On or about 23 September 2008, defendant was indicted for possession with the intent to sell or deliver cocaine; maintaining a vehicle for keeping, selling, or delivering cocaine; and attaining the status of habitual felon. On 14 May 2009, defendant moved to suppress certain evidence obtained as a result of a stop and search…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. OatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. RouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. RouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023