Legal Opinion

State v. Richmond

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 2011No. COA10-1296PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Terry Richmond (“defendant”) appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress, arguing that (1) the search of his person was unlawful because the officer “had neither reasonable suspicion nor probable cause to conduct the search of [defendant][,]” and (2) the nature of the object seized from him during the pat-down was not immediately apparent. For the following reasons, we affirm the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress.

I. Background

On 12 April 2010, defendant was indicted for possession with intent to manufacture, sell, and deliver marijuana in violation of N.C. Gen.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  5. State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API