Stewart v. Penny
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The inadequacy of our public land laws to afford reasonably workable methods, under present conditions, for the ■acquisition of public lands by private citizens is a matter of growing national concern. It is of particular concern to the State of Nevada inasmuch as approximately eighty-five per cent of the ■area of this State (the seventh largest) is still in the public domain. Much of it has a valuable potential for private use. Yet the archaic federal land laws, ■enacted in an era of an agrarian economy, are ill-suited to an orderly disposition of the lands into…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Boesche v. UdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Everett Foster v. Fred A. Seaton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Ard v. BrandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- C. W. Brennan v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- United States of America, and United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Curtis Howe Springer, AKA Curtis H. SpringerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Hall v. HickelDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1969
- Unruh v. UdallDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1967