Hershey Corp. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.
From the record it appears that the judgment in this ease was entered upon the motion of the carrier defendants that this case be dismissed for that the real parties in interest were the insurance companies, which, according to testimony of witnesses appearing by depositions taken by the plaintiff, had heretofore paid to the plaintiff in full the amount of the damage herein sought to be recovered; and it further appears that, upon consideration of said motion, said depositions were offered in evidence and the court reached the opinion that the payment by the insurance companies to- the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crews v. . CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Grantham v. . NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Cozad v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- J. S. Andrews v. . F. E. PritchettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Wilson v. . BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Jewell v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Dennis v. RedmondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Dennis v. . RedmondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.