Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Southern Ry.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 25, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Buchanan, J., Richland, April term, 1902. Action by G. W. Wilson against Southern Railway. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. cite: As to the evidence ruled out: 61 S. C., 337; Lawson on Ex. and Op. Ev., 2 ed., 469, 470-1-2-3-4; 18 111., 257: 38 S. C., 284. As to the charge: Code, 1902, sec. 2135; 24 S. C., 370; 40 S. C., 519; 31 S. C., 378; 41 S. C.. 91; 3 L. R. A., 224; 37 S. C., 386; 24 S. C., 109.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Pope.

This action was for $150 damages, under section 2135 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina, for injuries by fire to twenty-five acres of land of plaintiff caused by sparks from the engine of defendant, on or about the 5th day of March, 1901. The defendant interposed a general denial. At the trial before a jury both sides to the controversy submitted testimony. A verdict for $75 for the plaintiff was had. After judgment was entered thereon, the defendant appealed to this Court. The grounds of appeal — three in number — allege…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCandless v. Richmond, RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  2. State v. SummersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  3. Hunter v. Columbia &c. R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hall v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. Rogers v. WunderlichSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Department of Transportation v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Fraser-Patterson Lumber Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1948
  5. Hall v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API