Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Wunderlich

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 7, 1926No. 12008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice StabeEr.

This is an action for damages, both actual and punitive, brought by the plaintiffs against'the defendants for trespass upon the lands of the plaintiffs in cutting and appropriating timber upon said lands.

The complaint alleges-that the plaintiffs were at the time of the trespass and are now owners in fee and in possession of the real estate described in the complaint; that about December 1, 1922, and at sundry times thereafter, the defendants entered upon and trespassed upon the said lands and did cut and carry away a large amount of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. Marion County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  2. Hall v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Scott v. SeymourSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  4. Wilson v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Bellamy v. Grand Lodge, K. P.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BowmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Wilson v. KearseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. State v. GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Munn v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API