Department of Transportation v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
Plaintiff brings forward one assignment of error. It contends the testimony of H. A. Sandman should have been stricken because he did not have adequate knowledge of the area taken to testify. Defendant cites textbook authority and cases from this and other jurisdictions for the rule that in order to give an opinion as to value, a witness must be acquainted with the value of the land in controversy and must be familiar with the land or have examined it at the approximate time of taking. See Robbins v. Trading Post, Inc., 251 N.C. 663, 111 S.E. 2d 884 (1960); Highway Commission v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robbins v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. PrivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State Highway Commission v. MatthisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Blair v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Hall v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Magnolia North Property Owners' Ass'n v. Heritage Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Oaks At Rivers Edge Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Daniel Island Riverside Developers, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017