Legal Opinion
Centano v. Apfel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 28, 1999No. 98 Civ. 5082(SAS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rosaura Centano brings this action under section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a final determination of the Commissioner, of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying plaintiffs application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), in his decision denying benefits, summarized the evidence contained in the transcript of the administrative record. 1 See Transcript (“Tr.”) at 11-14. This decision became final when the Appeals Council denied…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Domingo Echevarria v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alvarado v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- Garvin v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Juarez v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- LaPorta v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020