Legal Opinion

Alvarado v. Barnhart

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided May 30, 2006No. 02 CV 6569LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of. Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that plaintiff Maria Alvarado is not disabled under the Social Security Act and, therefore, is not entitled to supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits.

Both the Commissioner and plaintiff have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e). For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s motion is granted, plaintiffs motion is denied, and the complaint is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
Ronald E. Veino, Sr. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Lind v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
Alvarado v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008