Legal Opinion
Garvin v. Barnhart
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 2003No. 01 CIV. 4532(JGK)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Marie P. Garvin (“Gar-vin”), brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The plaintiff seeks re view of a final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) determining that the plaintiff was not entitled to disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). 1 The plaintiff and the defendant both move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The issue on this motion is whether substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s finding that the plaintiff is not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.