State v. Tuplin
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
[¶ 1] We are called upon here to address the procedure constitutionally required of the trial court when a defendant must make the election to exercise his right to testify on his own behalf or his competing right to remain silent. Luke Tuplin appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Cole, J.) upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of assault (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. § 207(1)(A) (2005). Tuplin contends, among other things, that he was denied his constitutional right to testify at trial. We conclude that he waived that right, and we…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- State of Maine v. Bartolo P. FordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- State v. EricsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- State of Maine v. William TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.