Legal Opinion
Barcellos & Wolfsen, Inc. v. Westlands Water District
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 25, 1980No. CV 79-106-EDPPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PRICE, District Judge.
The motion of the United States of America, Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Cecil D. Andrus, Guy R. Martin, R. Keith Higginson and Bill E. Martin, hereinafter referred to as “The Federal Defendants” to dismiss the plaintiffs Third Amendment Complaint and Supplemental Complaint came on for hearing before the Court on Monday, March 31, 1980. Calendared for hearing at the same time and heard simultaneously with the foregoing motion was the motion of the United States of America, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Cecil D.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Orff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Orff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- State Engineer of Nevada v. South Fork Band of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone IndiansDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.