In Re Butler
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
Appellant in 32 claims asked for a patent relating to an aluminum piston for automobiles and engines.
Appellant’s piston is claimed to overcome the difficulty in using aluminum pistons with east-iron or steel cylinders. The use of steel pistons in the ordinary cylinder was objectionable in so far as the piston was required to be too loose in order to avoid expansion and sticking. Aluminum pistons were found to be better, but, owing to the fact that aluminum and aluminum alloys are said to have a thermal coefficient of expansion approximately twice that of iron, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oval Wood Dish Co. v. Sandy Creek, N. Y., Wood Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1894
- In re BurtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Globe Nail Co. v. United States Horse Nail Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
3Cited by11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Application of ShortellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- In Re MoellerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- Application of LiftonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In Re RundellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.