Legal Opinion
Hulen v. Yates
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 4, 2003No. 01-1530PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendants-Appellants, two state university officials, appeal from the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal under the qualification of the final judgment rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 announced in Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985), and we affirm in part and reverse in part.
Background
The following facts are drawn from the complaint and summary judgment materials. Plaintiff-Appellee Myron Hulen is a tenured faculty member at Colorado State University (“CSU”). He was appointed as an assistant…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Schrier v. University of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Riggins v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- DePree v. SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Montgomery v. City of ArdmoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Robbins v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.