Legal Opinion
Kim v. Quigg
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 25, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-702-APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HILTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. On June 7, 1988, plaintiffs filed suit seeking judicial review of the April 1, 1988 decision by the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks denying plaintiffs’ petitions for revival of an abandoned patent application. Because of the Futures Technology, Ltd. v. Quigg, 684 F.Supp. 430 (E.D.Va.1988) opinion entered by this court two weeks after the Commissioner’s decision and the presence of an equitable ownership argument in plaintiffs’ petitions, the parties agreed to an order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rude v. WestcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- In re MattullathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1912
- Wende v. HorineU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1911
- Garfield v. Western Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Arrow International v. Spire Biomedical, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006