Legal Opinion

Gwynn v. Gwynn

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 29, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Fraser, J., Spartanburg, October, 1886. The appeal was from the following decree : Under section 2087, Gen. Stat., a married woman “may purchase any species of property in her own name * * * in. the same manner as if she was unmarried.” An unmarried woman may, under this law, purchase an interest in common, a joint interest, an interest in possession, remainder, or reversion.

Read the full summary

Before Fraser, J., Spartanburg, October, 1886. The appeal was from the following decree : Under section 2087, Gen. Stat., a married woman “may purchase any species of property in her own name * * * in. the same manner as if she was unmarried.” An unmarried woman may, under this law, purchase an interest in common, a joint interest, an interest in possession, remainder, or reversion. Why may not a married woman, under the terms of this act, do the same ? Why may not a wife who can purchase as if unmarried, purchase jointly with her husband as well as his unmarried sister may do ? Steiu. Husb.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McIver.

On August 18, 1884, the plaintiff and the defendant, A. J. Gwynn, then and yet being man and wife, with a view to the formation of a commercial partnership, signed a paper, of which the following is a copy:

“Spartanburg, S. C., Aug. 18, 1884.
“We, the undersigned, have this day formed a copartnership for the purpose of carrying on a general dry goods business under the style and firm of Gwynn & Co. A. J. Gwynn, of the undersigned, is hereby authorized to have entire management of said business, and to make all contracts, endorsements,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoaglin v. C. M. Henderson &. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Owens v. MagillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Burwell v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. Burwell v. S.C. Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Kuster v. DicksonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API