Kuster v. Dickson
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina
Rule to Show Cause why a Receiver be not Appointed.
1Opinion of the CourtSimonton, J.
The defendants, E. B. Dickson and M. Reid Dickson, at one time doing business as Dickson Bros., in Augusta, Ga., became indebted to the plaintiffs, Kuster & Co., and suffered judgment in the sum of $1,108.34. Being insolvent, the firm was dissolved; E. B. Dickson removing to Greenville, and M. Reid Dickson to Spartanburg, in this state. The wife of M. R. Dickson inherited some $3,000 from her father, and, putting this into business, she purchased with cash and credit a stock of goods, and carries on business in Spartanburg under the name of “The New York Syndicate Store.” Her husband, M. R.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greig v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
- Gwynn v. GwynnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- Aultman & Taylor Co. v. GibertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
- Aultman & Taylor Co. v. RushSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- Brown v. ThomsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.