Legal Opinion
United States v. Peter Ward Pace
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1972No. 71-2235PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
Peter Ward Pace appeals from a conviction, at a non-jury trial, for failure to report for induction, in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462.
Pace registered with Local Board 33, Stockton, California, on February 3, 1964. After giving him several II-S deferments, the local board classified Pace I-A on August 29, 1968. The agency medical examiners gave him a complete physical examination on October 22, 1968, and found him acceptable. On April 17, 1969, the board ordered Pace to report for induction on May 21, 1969. On April 28, 1969, the board received Pace’s written request…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marvin Lustiger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Robert Nolen Briggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Daniel Owen LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. James Gordon LansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Michael Lee LowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Josiah L. Merrill, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Gerald Kenneth GressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. AullDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- United States v. David Kent StockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Kimberly Stiles BinghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.