Legal Opinion

United States v. Kimberly Stiles Bingham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1973No. 72-2688PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Bingham was convicted for failing to report for induction in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462(a). We affirm.

I

Bingham first contends that his conviction must be reversed because the clerk who, subsequent to sending him an order to report, received Selective Service Forms 127 and 217 failed to submit them to the local board for its consideration. In the Form 127 (Current Information Questionnaire), he stated he was a pacifist. To constitute reversible error, the registrant must have presented a prima facie case for reopening. United States v. Stacey, 441 F.2d 508, 510…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McGee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ehlert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mulloy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Daniel Owen LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Christian Winslow HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. James Robert ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Gregg Marshal DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Bruce Newton CoaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API