Legal Opinion

United States v. Aull

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 20, 1972No. 71 Cr. 509PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

The defendant, charged with willful refusal to submit to induction into the Armed Forces, 1 waived trial by jury. Upon conclusion of the trial, the court granted the defendant’s request for leave to submit briefs and reserved decision on his motion for judgment of acquittal.

The essential fact that the defendant intentionally and willfully refused to take the symbolic one step forward on April 7, 1971, when he reported and was found acceptable for induction is not in dispute. His assigned reason was that he was a conscientious objector. The defendant…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. James Seth StewartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. CottonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  3. United States v. Robert Edwin AullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. OrrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  5. United States v. Robert Edwin AullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API