Ingram v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Clarke
Affirming.
For r-eversal of the judgment herein convicting appellant of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, it is insisted that the evidence for the Commonwealth was incompetent because of defects in the affidavit and search warrant under which it was obtained, and that the court erred in admitting it and in refusing to direct an acquittal.
The affidavit upon which the warrant was issued, recites that the affiant:
“Has affidavit in his possession sworn to by D. Frazier, a citizen of the United States, that he has reasons for believing that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walters v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Goode v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Childers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wolf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Cotton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Richardson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Massey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.