Waters v. Double L, Inc.
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
The Model Business Corporation Act, as adopted in Idaho, allows shareholders to dissent from certain corporate actions and to demand payment for their shares at fair value. In this case we must decide (1) whether a corporation’s actions triggered the right to dissent; (2) whether the shareholders’ conduct estopped them from asserting their rights as dissenters, and (3) whether, in any event, the corporation substantially complied with those rights. The district court held that dissenters’ rights had been triggered and that the dissenting shareholders were entitled to judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Voeller v. Neilston Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Theriault v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Goods v. Lackawanna Leather Co.s.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
- First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Sieg Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Columbus Metal Industries, Inc. v. Aaron Ferer & Sons Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Determination Pursuant to Chapter 31, Article 1, Sections 122 & 123 of the Code of West Virginia of 1931, Amended, of Fair Value of Shares of Bank of RipleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.