Legal Opinion

Marx v. Marx

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 25, 1933No. 1 Div. 746PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

“The instances in which the legal remedies are held to be inadequate, and therefore a suit in equity for an accounting proper, are: 1. Where there are mutual accounts between the plaintiff and the defendant,— that is, where each of the two parties has received and paid on account of the other; 2. Where the accounts are all on one side, but there are circumstances of great, complication, or difficulties in the way of adequate relief at law; 3. Where a fiduciary relation exists between the parties, and a duty rests upon the defendant to render an account.” (Italics supplied.) 4…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Chrichton v. HaylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. First Nat. Bank of La Pine v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Southworth v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jacksonville Public Service Corp. v. Profile Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Pate v. BrunerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Doss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Rochell v. OatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API