Marx v. Marx
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
“The instances in which the legal remedies are held to be inadequate, and therefore a suit in equity for an accounting proper, are: 1. Where there are mutual accounts between the plaintiff and the defendant,— that is, where each of the two parties has received and paid on account of the other; 2. Where the accounts are all on one side, but there are circumstances of great, complication, or difficulties in the way of adequate relief at law; 3. Where a fiduciary relation exists between the parties, and a duty rests upon the defendant to render an account.” (Italics supplied.) 4…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Chrichton v. HaylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- First Nat. Bank of La Pine v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Southworth v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jacksonville Public Service Corp. v. Profile Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Pate v. BrunerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Doss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Rochell v. OatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.