First Nat. Bank of La Pine v. Bradley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The appeal is from a decree overruling demurrers to the bill for discovery and accounting. And interrogatories were propounded to respondent. The grounds of demurrer challenged the bill for that it discloses that complainant has an adequate remedy at law. Such is not the effect of its allegations and discovery sought.
The facts averred show that large sums of money had been collected on the collaterals pledged with respondent, and that complainant was without knowledge of the amounts collected, did not know how the same had been applied, and was entitled to an accounting and discovery.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Julian v. WoolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Ellis v. VandergriftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Hall v. McKellerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Converse Bridge Co. v. Geneva CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Ware's Adm'r v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- City of Mobile v. McCown Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Ingram v. People's Finance Thrift Co. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Faulk v. MoneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.