Legal Opinion

In re the Retirement Benefits of Yetka

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 10, 1996No. C8-96-486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLTAN, Judge*

Justice Yetka appeals the decision of the Minnesota State Retirement System Board denying him benefits based on the increased salary for justices that took effect January 4, 1993. We reverse.

FACTS

Relator, the Honorable Lawrence R. Yetka (Justice Yetka), became an associate justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court on July 3, 1973, and served continually until his retirement. His last term of office was scheduled to expire in January 1993. He did not seek re-election. Instead, on July 6, 1992, Governor Arne H. Carlson granted Justice Yetka an extension of his term to October…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Putnam v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Badger v. HoidaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  5. Signal Delivery Service, Inc. v. Brynwood Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Garlyn, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Jassmine D. Adams v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API