Austin v. Tillamook City
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The proceedings for the improvement of the street in question were commenced in March, 1920, and the improvement was made during that year. It appears that the matter had been under consideration for some time and different kinds of improvement had been considered, such as the width of the pavement. It was finally proposed to lay a thirty-six foot concrete pavement with an unimproved eight-foot parking strip in the center, making the total width of the actual pavement twenty-eight feet. The plaintiff, Austin, appears to have favored a sixteen-foot pavement and protested to the individual…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- King v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- King v. Portland CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Hughes v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boyle v. City of BendOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Western Amusement Co., Inc. v. City of SpringfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Sproul v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Bechtell v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Bennet v. City of OceanlakeOregon Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.