Legal Opinion

Graustein v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of the consignee, seeks to recover for loss of some of the machinery included in one shipment and for damage sustained by machinery contained in two other shipments. He alleges that the loss and damage were caused by the negligence of the defendant, the terminal carrier. After the case had been fully heard *165by a judge who died without making a decision, it was submitted to another judge in accordance with a .stipulation of the parties for his determination upon a transcript of all the evidence together with the exhibits that had been introduced at the first hearing.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Holt v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. O'Connor v. Benson Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Herrick v. WaittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Bruns v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Sreda v. KesselMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lane v. EpinardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Commonwealth v. MacGregorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Campanella & Cardi Construction Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API