Columbus Bar Assn. v. Klos
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 486.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. KLOS. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. ZINGARELLI. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Klos,
1998-Ohio-610.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Employment discrimination cases—Investigative fee applied to a nonrefundable retainer with contingent fee on sums received in excess of the retainer—General ambiguity of fee contracts—Charging a clearly excessive fee, when—DR 2-106(A). (Nos. 97-2254 and 97-2255—Submitted January 14, 1998—Decided April 22, 1998.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fox & Assocs. Co. v. PurdonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v. LansberryOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. KlosOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ZingarelliOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Halliburton-CohenOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. OkochaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1999