Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Klos

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1998No. 1997-2254PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 486.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. KLOS. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. ZINGARELLI. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Klos,

1998-Ohio-610.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Employment discrimination cases—Investigative fee applied to a nonrefundable retainer with contingent fee on sums received in excess of the retainer—General ambiguity of fee contracts—Charging a clearly excessive fee, when—DR 2-106(A). (Nos. 97-2254 and 97-2255—Submitted January 14, 1998—Decided April 22, 1998.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox & Assocs. Co. v. PurdonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v. LansberryOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. KlosOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. ZingarelliOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Halliburton-CohenOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. OkochaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Columbus Bar Assn. v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API