Chrisman v. Cherisman
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Lane County.
1Opinion of the CourtLobd, C. J.
This is a proceeding brought for the purpose of having an order of the County Court, admitting the will of C. E. Chrisman to probate, vacated and annulled, and to declare it void and of no effect. The will was executed on the twenty-sixth day of November, 1884, and the testator died on the twenty-first day of June, 1885, and left surviving him, a wife and seven children. On the twenty-fourth day of June, 1885, the said will was duly admitted to probate in common form, and' the executors thereof having duly qualified, entered upon the discharge of their duties in administering the estate.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Delafield v. . ParishNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Comstock v. Hadlyme Ecclesiastical SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
- McMechen v. McMechenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Rice v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Heirs of Clark v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1881
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Bever v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Holman's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Ames v. AmesOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Luper v. WertsOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Pickett's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1907
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.