Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniels
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 7, 2006No. 04-6344UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOK, District Judge.
Appellant, Carlos Daniels, appeals his conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm, contending, in essence, that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We disagree and affirm the ruling of the district court.
I
On November 25, 2003, a federal grand jury in the Western District of Tennessee returned an indictment which charged Daniels with having committed a criminal act in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). During the trial, Police Officer William Horn testified that, while on patrol in Memphis, Tennessee, he and his partner, Officer Jerrell…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Yervin K. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Joseph ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Victor GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Choate v. ArmsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- United States v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Joseph ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.